Showing posts with label ESD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ESD. Show all posts

Friday, 15 January 2010

Where is the solution to Global Warming? Science? Are you serious?

Here's the link to my netfriend's blog about Is science the key to global warming?

(I have contacted him and he is OK for me to cut and paste his work.)

Where is the solution to Global Warming? Is Science the key to Global Warming? Or should we ask "Is Global Warming the only issue we are facing?"

Do you think we can sit there, do nothing, (actually complaining the "lack" of air conditioning), and "business as usual"?

Get real!

The world is changing, unfortunately, for worse.

Here are a few points from the linked blog (and my thoughts):
  • Scientific proof is not the key point to the existence or non-existence of Global Warming. By the time we have good understandings of what's happening, the circumstances may have changed to some thing yet different again. And the proposition that we can (completely) understand the science of Global Warming is merely wishful thinking. The nature (or environment, or ecological system (implying a living and ever changing system), or God's creation, whichever way you say it) is beyond science's domain. Science is only part of the nature.
  • We can't see the big picture. But that doesn't mean we only look at ourselves, or worse, nothing. We need to have a variable focus. Look at the big picture and ourselves. But then, this leads to ...
  • What value do we put on oneself and one's surroundings? Do the surroundings exist merely to serve us? This goes particularly to women. I know so many women saying something like "Air conditioning is the greatest invention", "I can't live without air conditioning", "Why is the air conditioning not on?", or merely stare (and grudge) at me when I suggest turning the fan instead of the A/C on. Is human comfort so much more important than the varnishing of the world?
  • "Does human lose connection with the environment?" Actually, this is a variant of the point above. I heard of this when I was in a training course of "Building Thermal Performance". For example, when people come home from work and find that the indoor is "warm", first thing most people do is to flip on the air conditioning switch. -- Coming back to the connection with nature, can human win over nature? Can human ignore nature? ...... We should know the answer but are we doing what we should be doing?
  • Do we know we are doing harm (or good?!) to the environment and ourselves, sooner or later? This may or may not be Global Warming. Things can range from intoxication from chemicals, fertilisers and insecticides used in agricultural and other cases, (e.g. Australia talks about BPA in baby bottles now. BPA had been banned in some other countries.), light pollution (e.g. bird are somehow confused with the night sky during their migration), GM genetically modified food, ..... etc. The list goes on and on.

Friday, 17 October 2008

Some new ideas

Instead of staying quiet for a while, I just think of an idea.

This is about posting the links that I read for the day.

So I can keep track of what info and blogs I've gone through.

Today, I skip through the following info:

Magnetic train:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_levitation_train
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%A3%81%E6%87%B8%E6%B5%AE%E5%88%97%E8%BB%8A

Lunar space elevator:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_space_elevator

Other house energy rating software - Sustainability Victoria

ZTC Ltd. Tether-Sling Prototype - Page 10 - Orbiter-Forum

What is a well ventilated fridge space?

What is indoor or sheltered clothes drying line?

Energy Labelling - Selecting an efficient appliance Clothes dryer

Energy Labelling - Selecting an efficient appliance dish washer

Here are the url's I've read through yesterday or before, as from my firefox's browsing history:

Raining goals as Cahill and Co make statement - Football - Sport - smh.com.au

We were a circus: Rio praises new England order - Football - Sport - smh.com.au

Australian Building Codes Board: BCA 2008 Volume Two - List of Amendments

[轉貼][科技探討]MK82的衝擊——解析MK82核彈的原理 - 高達專區 - 動畫/漫畫 - 香港討論區 discuss.com.hk - 一個香港只得一個香港討論區

Which Linux makes the best business Windows replacement desktop? | Computerworld Blogs

Shorelink Library Network

Nabers Performance Rating Calculator

Windows Energy Ratings Scheme - WERS

MSI Announces Wind 2, Says Customers Hate Linux | Gadget Lab from Wired.com

Why smart people uses Linux « TransLXP - By Infrasound

Canonical Confirms MSI's Linux Return Rate Statement

Why so stupid?: how the human race has never really learned to think - Google Search

Edward de Bono - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1/144 HG GN-X III A-Laws Type

Sale Items www.hlj.com

Main Page - DramaWiki

Linux Mint 5 "Elyssa" - XFCE Community Edition - Linux Mint

Solar power satellite - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

gundam 00 technology - Search results - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Artificial intelligence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

pagetable.com » Blog Archive » Bill Gates’ Personal Easter Eggs in 8 Bit BASIC

Asustek launches new Eee PC laptop - Articles - Laptops - Digital Life

VF-25F Messiah Valkyrie Aruto Type (Plastic model) Bandai Macross Frontier 1/72

Space tourism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spaceflight - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Real Cost of Space Exploration - a knol by Edward Isarevich

Moon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Earth Statistics

What is the diameter of the Sun?

Bureau - New South Wales Observations

Australian Water Availability - Solar Exposure

The Gardens of Babylon: Preliminary ideas about my PhD project

HVAC Systems

Hydrogen, H2, Physical properties, safety, MSDS, enthalpy, material compatibility, gas liquid equilibrium, density, viscosity, flammability, transport properties

Hydrogen - Specific Heat Capacity

SE_Ideal_App_for_FEL.pdf (application/pdf Object)

Space Elevator GEO Station on Flickr - Photo Sharing!

Music of the Spheres: Popular Space Elevator View

Space maths & physics forum - Orbiter Forums

AttitudeMFD - OrbiterWiki

What is Earth's mean radius? - a definition from Whatis.com

Toshiba takes wraps off netbook | Register Hardware

Berbatov nets twice in United romp - Football - Sport - smh.com.au

The ROI of PC power management |Sustainable IT | Ted Samson | InfoWorld

Chinese Proverbs quotes

Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards (WELS) Scheme home page

Where Windows is #2 to Linux | Computerworld Blogs

Full Circle Magazine | Issue 17

ABSA

2008 Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference, Awards & Trade Show - Courses & Events - Green Building Council Australia (GBCA)

Leading Green Thinkers Sydney - Courses & Events - Green Building Council Australia (GBCA)

Five Ways To Cut Energy Bills - Forbes.com

Wow, I have been through quite some webpages.

I believe this will be an asset which allows me to trace back information on another day!

Thursday, 4 September 2008

Unproductive August blogger

Wow, I didn't write blog in August?!

I was busy, I am busy, and I am going to be busy with real energy efficiency and "green(wash)" work.

What I've done in August:

  • Several BCA Section J DTS (Deemed-to-satisfy) assessment reports.
  • Completion inspection for the first Section J Report I've done. The building is at The Entrance (90 km from where I work)
  • A few JV3 Performance Assessments for some proposed buildings. One of them is a big retail chain with specific alternative solution using PMV/PPD and HSI (Heat Stress Index).
  • A number of NatHERS/BASIX assessments orf residential apartments and houses.
  • I've moved house.
  • I had a friend's family visiting me from HK. (Dr. Square Fong) We are both from the same B.Eng. course. We speak the same "green" language. And it might be alien language to our wives and other people (LOL)!
  • Manage issues with the building of my family's new house. Yet more are still to come!
There are signs that the Australian economy is slowing down. When it appeared I might have a little break in my busy work schedule, suddenly some EE and ESD projects rushed in. The clients just liked to have the job done "Yesterday". (Yes, this is the trend. All jobs are already overdue?!!)

Some reasons (excuses) for the silence in the blogosphere!

Now, need to get on with the JV3 energy simulation which will due tomorrow! I will be late! OH, dun!

Thursday, 31 July 2008

Update to "Unofficial ABGR Assessment"

I have an entry about Unofficial ABGR Assessment back in February.

I actually finished the report around June/July.

So, here are the updates from the assessment:

The base building ABGR (now it is NABERS Energy) could achieve 5 stars. The tenancy ratings ranged from 0 star to 2 stars. So there was some disparity here.

To fairly compare this building with other buildings, the whole building rating should be used.

The whole building rating was assessed to be 3 stars. This means "Best Practice" according to the ABGR official definition. This should be considered fair or even good for a building around 20 years of age.

However, in the Australian building market place, knowledgeable tenants will demand 4 or 4.5 stars.

To bring the building to 4 or 4.5 stars, the energy consumption has to be cut down by about 40%!!

For an existing building, this is not easy to achieve this. Some major renovations will be required to cut 40% energy use.

Well, when I talked to the property manager, "cost effectiveness" came before "sustainability"!

You know what that means?

Tuesday, 6 May 2008

ESD AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN AUSTRALIA (4) - BCA SECTION J - ENERGY EFFICIENCY

I think I may move on to BCA Section J.

Some time ago, I read an article in "Ecolibrium" (AIRAH professional journal) about "paradigm shift" in the Australian business sectors towards "Sustainabilty".

It was viewed as a "nice to have" features. But nowadys, the view is that sustainability is essential to the continuing development. And after all, sustainability really bear benefits for the building owners and building users.

And from my personal experience, large developers are really embracing sustainability whole heartly. Smaller ones are not so consistent but the trend is clear that sustainability has its place and is becoming more and more important!

Back to BCA (Building Code of
Australia).

BCA is similar to “Building Ordinance” in HK. For some quick info on HK’s Building Ordinance, see this: http://www.bd.gov.hk/english/services/index_support3.html

However, BCA, starting from 2004, is updated annually.

In 2000, all State and Territory governments had agreed to introduce mandatory energy efficiency standards into the BCA in order to reduce GHG emissions attributable to the operation of buildings.

The first stage was to introduce energy efficiency measures into the BCA Volume Two on
1 January 2003. (BCA Volume Two relates to requirements and regulations for freestanding / detached houses and garages.)

The second stage was to introduce energy measures for multi-residential buildings into BCA Volume One on
1 May 2005.

The final (third) stage for introducing energy efficiency measures is to include energy efficiency measures for all other building classifications in BCA Volume One. (BCA Volume One includes requirements and regulations on all other buildings including commercial, retail, industrial, institutional, recreational, schools, hospitals, aged homes, etc.)

I’ve said it before – the inception of the plan dates back to 2000. The actual “full” implementation date is 2006!

For places that haven’t started, how long will they take to have some proper legislation in place?

You can have some good in-depth understanding on the rationale of Energy Efficiency in BCA by reading these "Handbooks". Mind you one of them is over 150 pages and the other is over 300 pages!

http://www.abcb.gov.au/documents/energy/Handbook_vol1.pdf

http://www.abcb.gov.au/documents/energy/Handbook_vol2.pdf

So how can a building comply with BCA Section J?

Basically, there are two approaches:
1.Deemed-to-satisfy (DTS) method (prescriptive method)
2.Verification method (JV3) (JV2 is superseded from 1 May 2008)

With the DTS method, it is like ticking a checklist to comply with
ALL the requirements.

With the JV’s, the annual energy consumptions of the building under different scenarios are calculated. If they are under a certain benchmark, then they are compliant.

And I list some major categories in the DTS method.

There are eight categories to be checked for Energy Efficiency compliance:

Part J1 – Building Fabric

Roof and Ceiling Construction
Roof Lights
Walls
Floors
(In most cases, insulation, esp. roof insulation, is required to keep the temperature in a building less prone to outside temperature fluctuations.)

Part J2 – External Glazing

Two methods (spreadsheets) for checking compliance
Shading is also important
(Generally, large glass area without shading will fail.)

Part J3 – Building Sealing

Chimneys and flues
Roof lights
Windows and doors
Exhaust fans
Construction of roofs, walls and floors
(Basically, there should be some things to prevent unwanted air coming in or out of a building)

Part J4 – Air Movement
Only applicable for multi-residential buildings
(This part requires that the openable window area equals or exceed a certain % of floor area.)

Part J5 – Air-conditioning and Ventilation Systems
Air-conditioning and ventilation systems
Time switch
Heating and chilling systems
Miscellaneous exhaust systems
(Energy efficient air conditioning and ventilation systems with proper controls (like the inexpensive time switches) are required to pass the requirements.)

Part J6 – Artificial lighting and power
Interior artificial lighting
Interior artificial lighting and power control
Interior decorative and display lighting
Artificial lighting around the perimeter of a building
Boiling water and chilled water storage units
(Simply speaking, you need good energy efficient lightings and control switches to comply. Normal light bulb in most cases will fail.)

Part J7 – Hot water supply
(Need a proper design to comply, i.e. don’t just get a “no-body” to do it.)

Part J8 – Access for Maintenance
(Just allow access to repair and fix equipment and components.)

It may sound simple from the above descriptions. But there are many small details to check.

And I have some insiders' comments to the BCA Section J. .......

Wednesday, 26 March 2008

A little drama of windows

Last week, I was working on NatHERS and BASIX for a residential building in Sydney City.


Well, a little drama with the architect happened.

Here are some emails between us.

I've seen a number of architects. Their most important concern is aesthetics, or in other words, the appearance of "their" building.

"Sustainability"? They don't care!


===============================

From: Dont Sustain
Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2008
To: FireStallion; Loss Energy
Cc: Sudden Jump; Minimum Spend; Go Froth
Subject: RE: BASIX certification on Site X


FS Comments in red

Regards

Dont Sustain

Associate Director | nom. Architect xxxx

0402 xxx xxx


From: FireStallion

Sent: Thursday, 20 March 2008

To: Dont Sustain; Loss Energy
Cc: 'Sudden Jump'; 'Minimum Spend'; 'Go Forth'
Subject: RE: BASIX certification on Site X

Dont and Loss

I’ve worked on some different options to get the north east corner apt of level 12-17 under the cooling allowance 64.7

  • Option A – Louvres to all glazings – 76.8 Failed
  • Option B – As option A but with window height of B2, B3 changed to 1.6m – 66.1 Failed
  • Option C – Double glazing to all glazings with external blinds to Terrace, B2 & B3 – 76.1 Failed
  • Option D – Different double glazing with B2 & B3 external blinds, type 1523 (6mm super grey/6mm air/4mm Energy advantage Low-E, U=2.552, SHGC=0.157) – 27.6 passed What double glazing is proposed for the northern windows….ie the main curtain wall? I would prefer not to commit to external blinds. As this is only morning sun to the east to B2 and B3 I am surprised it makes such a difference.
  • Option E – As option D but using double glazing type 657 (5mm SuperGrey/13mm air/4mm clear, U=4.112, SHGC 0.203) – 44.8 passed Is this just the glass to the B2 and B3 or to the full north?
  • Option F – As option E but with no external blind to B2 & B3 – 47.4 passed

And as a sensitivity comparison, residence 2 is also compared with different options, cooling allowance 64.8:

  • Option A – as SC layout with B1, B2 & B3 external blinds – 59.9 passed
  • Option B – as option A but with no external blinds – 80.1 failed
  • Option C – as option A but with blinds to all glazing – 45.8 passed If we pass without external blinds then that’s great news. Means at least the client does not need to commit as yet on this western terrace

From the above results, I have the following remarks:

  • The SHGC (Solar Heat Gain Coefficient) of the proposed glass is critical to keep the cooling load down other than shading devices. SHGC should be kept under 0.3 or lower. Double or single glazing, which affects the U-value, is not as critical. However, glazing with low SHGC tends to be dark and may not have good visual effects. Reflectivity and transmission data is not available at the moment to check if they comply with DCP or not. When you meet with Pilkington, check the SHGC’s (under 0.3) and the reflectivities (under 20%) to shortlist eligible glass types. Yes…dark glass is a problem. Will discuss at meeting
  • External blinds, or other forms of shading, have a very significant impact on the cooling. In many cases, the shading can make or break the BASIX allowances. [For comparison, direct solar radiation through reference glass can be up to 550 W/m2* where diffuse (shaded) solar radiation can get down to 40 W/m2*. That’s a 1275% difference. Even very good and sophisticated glazing can’t beat a simple overhang. * From p.43 of Carrier System Design Manual Part 1]

FS – I think you should come to the Pilkington meeting please. Will send the invite

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Regards

FireStallion

Accredited ABGR Assessor, GBCA (Green Star) Accredited Professional

Email: firestallion100@gmail.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Dont Sustain

Sent: Monday, 10 March 2008

To: FireStallion; Loss Energy
Cc: Sudden Jump; Minimum Spend; Go Forth
Subject: RE: BASIX certification on Site X

FireStallion

Comments below.

For the moment, the typical 4 apt floors are modelled as per your proposed glazing allocation. It appears apt 1 has some issues to get pass BASIX as its cooling load is “very” significant. This is because the height of the windows are assumed to be as high as possible and for the Living and Family Rooms glazing, no shading is available.

Windows are typically at 2800 head. Yes there is a lot of glass….but this is the premium view so we will not be reducing extent of glass. The main glazing to the north is double glazed so this reducing cooling load significantly. The remaining glass to the east then is proposed as single glazed. We seek your advice on whether we need to extend extent of double glazing…but would prefer high performance single glass as first port of call.

One point to be bear in mind is that: although the remaining three apts pass the BASIX cooling and heating requirements, it is recommended that each apt should improve its thermal performance to around 5 stars to get better results towards achieving a 5 star Green Star Residential rating. Also note that the weighted average cooling requirement of all apts is 46.4. There is a (remote) possibility that all apts pass their required heating and cooling requirements but the weighted average requirements cannot be met.

Here are some suggestions to improve the apts’ thermal performances:

· Reduce glazing areas, esp. apt 1 will require some rationalising of the glazing areas to get pass BASIX. An empirical value for glazing to floor area ratio is 35% or below (with good shading available), esp. if 5 stars NatHERS is to be achieved. Apt 1 has a glazing to floor area ratio of 52%. Can’t reduce glazing…The amazing view is what is selling these apartments. Northern glass is double glazing. Do we need to extend extent of double glazing.

· Provide shading, set backs and /or light shelves to windows. This is mandatory to claim cross ventilation bonus in BASIX. (Note that the louvred screens are very effective in reducing the solar heat gain for the western façade glazing.) I am confused….how is shading mandatory for cross ventilation bonus…and with high glazing…why are light shelves required….when the higher glazing means more light ingress.

The main western window as per original markup is double glazed with no external shading. Same scenario as the DA.

Likewise the single glass to the terrace stacking is set back within the terrace zone and overhang. Same scenario again as the DA.

We can introduce some external glazed roller blinds or equal to the western windows that are set back from the terrace line if needed…but we are loath to add additional louvred screens. For memory we went through the same debate for the DA.

· Use alternative glazing types. Currently, the selected glazing types have very good thermal performances – single glazing with U = 3.855 and SHGC = 0.466 and double glazing with U=2.255 and SHGC = 0.407.

· We seek your advice here. At DA stage you provided us with a list of glass options with general performance.

I propose a meeting on Thursday afternoon at our office to discuss. Can you confirm your availability.

Sudden- would you be free – say Thurs 4pm on your way home???

Can you send us the proposed elevations for fine tuning the NatHERS calculations?

Loss will send through

Regards

Dont Sustain

Associate Director | nom. Architect xxxx

====================================================

My "philosophy" will be somehow different to the above.

If you have a magnificent view, why don't you be part of it?

It's the connection with the environment that I am speaking of.

Modern life separate us from our environment. If you have a good view, then go to the balcony and be part of it. Fell the breeze, smell the scent, hear the sound! Don't just look at the view!

Well, there is a fundamental difference in philosophy anyway.

With the client on the architects side, it looks like the unsustainable option of providing view with "better" glazing will prevail, rather than a simple sustainable alternative.

What cost is "Sustainability"?




Wednesday, 12 March 2008

ESD AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN AUSTRALIA (3) - ABGR

This is from ABGR's website:
http://www.abgr.com.au/About_ABGR/

QUOTE:

About ABGR

The Australian Building Greenhouse Rating (ABGR) Scheme is a 'world first initiative' to help building owners and tenants across
Australia benchmark their greenhouse performance.
Benefits of ABGR:

* Provides market recognition and a competitive advantage for low greenhouse emitters and energy efficient buildings;
* Encourages best practice in the design, operation and maintenance of commercial buildings to minimise greenhouse emissions

Administered nationally by the NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change (DECC) and locally by leading state greenhouse agencies, the ABGR scheme rates buildings from one to five stars with five stars representing exceptional greenhouse performance. Current market best practice in Australia is three stars.

Key features of ABGR:

* It’s voluntary – a rating can be initiated by a building owner, manager or tenant;
* It rates a building according to its actual performance, using 12 months’ energy data;
* It can be used for the base building (central services), whole building or individual tenancies;
* It allows developers to “badge” the greenhouse performance of their new office development from the outset on the proviso that
DECC will rate its actual operational performance and advise the tenants;
* It’s available now for all Australian office buildings.

Now, I would briefly talk about some practical situations of ABGR.

As I mentioned earlier, though officially ABGR is "voluntary", there are other forces that make ABGR "semi-regulation" or "psuedo regulation":

* The NSW state government have a policy that existing offices need an ABGR rating. If it is not 3 star ABGR or above, then it should be retrofit to 4 star or above. (see link below)
* When a state government authroity or office build or rent a new office building or space, the space should achieve 4.5 stars minimum. (See http://www.premiers.nsw.gov.au/pubs_dload_part4/prem_circs_memos/prem_memos/2004/m2004-04.htm )
* Development Control Plans (DCP's) of many local councils also require that new office buildings to have an "Energy Performance Report" (
EPR) or simply have an ABGR committment of at least 4 stars. (Check the DCP link above for Green Star)
* It is also a requirement of Green Star buildings to have a minimum of 4 star ABGR to be eligible for the application of Green Star. (
ENE-1 & ENE-2)

So you can see there are many things that require the use of ABGR. It is actually not "voluntary".

Friday, 29 February 2008

ESD AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN AUSTRALIA (2) - GREEN STAR

Firstly, Green Star!

To clarify who are "Green Star Accredited Professionals" or "GBCA Accredited Professionals", here is the relevant description from the Green Star - Office Design Manual:


Green Star Accredited Professionals are experienced building industry practitioners who have demonstrated their understanding of the Green Star rating system and the benefits of integrated design.

To become a Green Star Accredited Professional, candidates must attend a GBCA Green Star Accredited Professional course and pass the associated exam.

Green Star is a voluntary scheme for developers to "market" their buildings.

So far, there are only 29 buildings have a formal Green Star certification. (As from GBCA;s website)

The Green Star scale is from one to six.

What is a one star building? And what is a six star building?

Here is a table for the meaning of the “Stars”:

Stars

Score (from eight categories after application of weighting factors)

Outcome / Represents

One star

10-19

Minimum practice

Two stars

20-29

Average practice

Three stars

30-44

Good practice

Four stars

45-59

Best practice; eligible for application of Four Star Green Star Rating certificate

Five stars

60-74

Australian excellence; eligible for application of Five Star Green Star Rating certificate

Six stars

75-100

World Leader; eligible for application of Six Star Green Star Rating certificate

The Green Star assesses eight aspects (categories) of a building. They are:

1. Management
2. IEQ (Indoor Environment Quality)
3. Energy
4. Transport
5. Water
6. Materials
7. Land Use & Ecology
8. Emissions

Plus a special 5 credits points of innovation that cannot be assessed under the 8 categories.

The first category in the rating tool is "Management":

There are 7 items under "Management":

Man-1

Green Star Accredited Professional

To encourage and recognise the adoption of environmentally sustainable principles from the earliest project stages throughout design and construction.

Man-2

Commissioning - Clauses

To encourage and recognise improved building services performance and energy efficiency due to adequate commissioning and hand-over to the building owner.

Man-3

Commissioning - Building Tuning

To encourage and recognise improved energy efficiency and comfort within the building in all seasons due to adequate commissioning.

Man-4

Commissioning - Commissioning Agent

To encourage and recognise the appointment of an independent commissioning agent from design through to handover.

Man-5

Building Users' Guide

To encourage and recognise the provision of guidance material to enable building users to achieve the environmental performance envisaged by the design team, and to manage future changes that promote efficiency and environmental quality.

Man-6

Environmental Management

To encourage and recognise the adoption of a formal environmental management system in line with established guidelines during construction.

Man-7

Waste Management

To encourage and recognise management systems that facilitate the reduction of construction waste going to landfill.

The second, arguably the most important category is the "Indoor Environmental Quality / IEQ":

This category has the most number of items. It is very important to achieve energy efficiency, material safety, etc. but at the same time not sacrificing the indoor environmental quality:

IEQ-1

Ventilation Rates

To encourage and recognise the provision of increased outside air rates, in order to promote a healthy indoor environment.

IEQ-2

Air Change Effectiveness

To encourage and recognise systems that provide for the effective delivery of clean air through reduced mixing with indoor pollutants in order to promote a healthy indoor environment.

IEQ-3

Carbon Dioxide Monitoring and Control

To encourage and recognise the provision of response monitoring of carbon dioxide (CO2) levels to ensure delivery of minimum outside air requirements.

IEQ-4

Daylight

To encourage and recognise designs that provide good levels of daylight for building users.

IEQ-5

Daylight Glare Control

To encourage and recognise buildings that are designed to reduce the discomfort of glare from natural light.

IEQ-6

High Frequency Ballasts

To encourage and recognise the increase in workplace amenity by avoiding low frequency flicker that may be associated with fluorescent lighting.

IEQ-7

Electric Lighting Levels

To encourage and recognise base building provided office lighting that is not over-designed.

IEQ-8

External Views

To encourage and recognise reduced eyestrain for building occupants by allowing long distance views and the provision of visual connection to the outdoors.

IEQ-9

Thermal Comfort

To encourage and recognise the use of thermal comfort assessments to guide design options.

IEQ-10

Individual Comfort Control

To recognise the benefits of individual control to provide good thermal comfort.

IEQ -11

Asbestos

To encourage and recognise actions taken to reduce health risks to occupants from the presence of hazardous materials.

IEQ-12

Internal Noise Levels

To encourage and recognise buildings that are designed to maintain internal noise levels at an appropriate level.

IEQ-13

Volatile Organic Compounds

To encourage and recognise projects that reduce the detrimental impact on occupant health from finishes emitting internal air pollutants.

IEQ-14

Formaldehyde Minimisation

To encourage and recognise projects that reduce the use of formaldehyde composite wood products in order to promote a healthy indoor environment.

IEQ-15

Mould Prevention

To encourage and recognise the design of systems which reduce the risk of mould growth and its associated detrimental impact on occupant health.

IEQ-16

Tenant Exhaust Riser

To encourage and recognise the provision of buildings designed with a general exhaust riser that can be used by tenants to remove indoor pollutants from printing and photocopy areas.

So the third category (IMO, second most important category) is Energy:

Ene-1

Energy

To reduce base building operational energy and greenhouse gas emissions.

Ene-2

Energy Improvement

To encourage and recognise projects that contain design features that help to minimise operational energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of the base building over and above the Conditional Requirement in Ene-1.

Ene-3

Electrical Sub-metering

To encourage and recognise the provision of energy sub-metering to facilitate energy monitoring of base building services.

Ene-4

Tenancy Sub-metering

To encourage and recognise the provision of energy sub-metering to facilitate energy monitoring by tenants or end users.

Ene-5

Office Lighting Power Density

To encourage and recognise lighting design practices which lessen lighting energy consumption while maintaining appropriate lighting levels.

Ene-6

Office Lighting Zoning

To encourage and recognise lighting design practices that offer greater flexibility for light switching, making it easier to light only occupied areas.

Ene-7

Peak Energy Demand Reduction

To encourage and recognise projects that implement systems to reduce peak demand on energy supply infrastructure.

The fourth category is Transport:

Tra-1

Provision of Car Parking

To encourage and recognise building design that promotes the utilisation of alternative modes of transport by limiting available car park spaces.

Tra-2

Small Parking Spaces

To encourage and recognise building design that supports the use of smaller, more fuel efficient vehicles for work commuting.

Tra-3

Cyclist Facilities

To encourage and recognise building design that promotes the use of bicycles by occupant and visitors by ensuring adequate cyclist facilities are provided.

Tra-4

Commuting Public Transport

To encourage and recognise developments with proximity and good access to public transport networks which have frequent services.

The fifth cateogry is Water:

Wat-1

Occupant Amenity Potable Water Efficiency

To encourage and recognise systems which have the potential to reduce the potable water consumption of building occupants.

Wat-2

Water Meters

To encourage and recognise the design of systems that monitor and manage water consumption.

Wat-3

Landscape Irrigation Water Efficiency

To encourage and recognise the design of systems that aim to reduce the consumption of potable water for landscape irrigation.

Wat-4

Cooling Tower Water Consumption

To encourage and recognise building design that reduces the potential demand on potable water supplies and infrastructure due to water-based building cooling systems.

Wat-5

Fire System Water Consumption

To encourage and recognise building design that reduces potable water consumption of the building's fire protection and essential water storage systems.

The sixth category is Materials:

Mat-1

Recycling Waste Storage

To encourage and recognise the inclusion of storage space that facilitates the recycling of resources used within offices to reduce waste going to landfill.

Mat-2

Re-use of Façade

To encourage and recognise the re-use of existing façades to reduce new material consumption.

Mat-3

Re-use of Structure

To encourage and recognise the re use of existing structures to reduce new material consumption.

Mat-4

Shell and Core or Integrated Fitout

To encourage and recognise the reduction of material wastage during tenancy fitouts.

Mat-5

Recycled Content of Concrete

To encourage and recognise the reduction of embodied energy and resource depletion due to the use of concrete.

Mat-6

Recycled Content of Steel

To encourage and recognise the reduction in embodied energy and resource depletion due to the use of recycled steel.

Mat-7

PVC Minimisation

To encourage and recognise the reduction of Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) products in Australian buildings.

Mat-8

Sustainable Timber

To encourage and recognise the specification of re-used timber products or timber that has certified environmentally responsible forest management practices.

The seventh category is "Land Use & Ecology":

Eco-1

Ecological Value of Site

To encourage wherever possible development on land that already has a limited ecological value and discourage the development of ecologically valuable sites.

Eco-2

Re-use of Land

To encourage and recognise the re-use of land that has previously been developed.

Eco-3

Reclaimed Contaminated Land

To encourage and recognise positive actions to use contaminated land that otherwise would not have been developed.

Eco-4

Change of Ecological Value

To encourage and recognise the minimisation of ecological impact from a development and maximise the enhancement of a site for both new and existing buildings.

Eco-5

Topsoil and Fill Removal from Site

To encourage and recognise practices that reduce the amount of topsoil and fill removed from development sites.

The eight category is "Emissions":

Emi-1

Refrigerant ODP

To encourage and recognise the reduction of potential long-term damage to the Earth's stratospheric ozone layer through the accidental release of ozone depleting substances to the atmosphere.

Emi-2

Refrigerant GWP

To encourage and recognise the selection of refrigerants that reduce the potential for increased global warming arising from the emission of refrigerants to the Earth's atmosphere in the event of accidental release of intensive greenhouse gases to the atmosphere.

Emi-3

Refrigerant Leak Detection

To encourage and recognise systems which reduce the release of refrigerants to the atmosphere arising from leakages in a building's cooling plant.

Emi-4

Refrigerant Recovery

To encourage and recognise systems that reduce and prevent unnecessary loss of refrigerants in the event of a leak.

Emi-5

Watercourse Pollution

To encourage and recognise project design that reduces the potential of pollution in water running off from buildings and hard surfaces to natural watercourses.

Emi-6

Reduced Flow to Sewer

To encourage and recognise building design that reduces water flows to the municipal sewerage systems for treatment.

Emi-7

Light Pollution

To encourage and recognise lighting design that reduces pollution from the unnecessary dispersion of light into the night sky and onto neighbouring property.

Emi-8

Cooling Towers

To encourage and recognise building systems design which eliminates the risk of Legionnaire’s Disease from cooling towers.

Emi-9

Insulant ODP

To encourage and recognise designs which reduce the potential for long-term damage to the Earth's stratospheric ozone layer from ozone depleting substances used in the manufacture or composition of thermal insulation.

The last cateogory "Innovation" is not officially a category. But it give credits to innovative ideas that cannot be assessed under other categories or some ideas that exceed the stated requirements.

Inn-1

Innovative Strategies and Technologies

To encourage and recognise the spread of innovative initiatives for commercial building applications that improve a development's environmental impact.

Inn-2

Exceeding Green Star Benchmarks

To encourage and recognise design initiatives which demonstrate additional environmental benefit by exceeding the current benchmarks in Green Star - Office Design.

Inn-3

Environmental Design Initiatives

To encourage and recognise design initiatives which have a significant measurable environmental benefit and which are not awarded points by Green Star – Office Design.

Green Star is voluntary.

Some big developers, however, are using it as a marketing tool.

But if you spend that much to make a building "green", you are actually getting a very good building (supposedly).

Somehow, some councils adopt the Green Star approach to their "Development Control Plans". (DCP's)

DCP's are local requirements imposed by the specific councils
(local government) in the area.

I have seen and used one DCP that uses "Score Cards" to make a building green. See the link:
http://202.148.138.211/downloaddocument.aspx?DocumentID=1157

The score cards are originated from the Green Star Rating Tool.

So, in some way, Green Star is becoming increasingly important. As What I said before for ABGR, Green Star is like a semi-regulation in some areas.

Thursday, 28 February 2008

ESD AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN AUSTRALIA (1) - INTRODUCTION (1 of 5)

ESD AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN AUSTRALIA

Well, firstly you may consider there are three levels of "energy rating" schemes.

1. Aspirational - Green Star (I am a GBCA Accredited Professional or more usually known as Green Star Professional)

2. Operational - ABGR (Australian Building Greenhouse Rating, in full) (I am also an "Accredited ABGR Assessor").

3. Mandatory - BCA (Building Code of Australia) Section J Energy Efficiency.

(1) & (2) are voluntary. (3) is mandatory which comes to force in May 2006 (for NSW including
Sydney, it was November 2006)

Although ABGR seems like voluntary, it is like semi-mandatory particularly for large developers. More details coming.

Wednesday, 13 February 2008

Unofficial ABGR Assessment

Today I've been to a business park to carry out the preliminary assessment on energy use of one of the buildings.

I've talk to the Operations Manager of the premises. It's somehow "interesting" to talk to people with "hands on" experience to the services, etc. in buildings.

I can see his enthusiasm to help me out to do the energy assessment, maybe a little too "hot headed".

But in doing ABGR, the actual assessment is not the most difficult part.

The most difficult part is to gather the information necessary to get a proper rating as required by the ABGR protocol.


And for this one, it would be to gather the energy bills from ALL tenants and their cooperation to provide their occupancy hours when 20% of people is there in the morning and when only 20% of people is remaining in the office.

I've been through this with another project. Amazingly, it took weeks or even months to gather the info. And by the time the last info comes in, the first info could have been expired.

We'll see how good or bad this building is later.

Thursday, 24 January 2008

The many dimensions of sustainable development

This is an article from the very informative sustainability magazine from CSIRO, Ecos.

It appears than the definition of "Sustainable Development" should be clarified.

There are many good points from the article, particularly, the causes and to a lesser extent the impacts of not "Going Green".

The article can be found at : http://www.publish.csiro.au/?act=view_file&file_id=EC139p13.pdf



The many dimensions of sustainable development

Abstract: These days, everyone seems to be talking about sustainability. But are we all on the same wavelength when we use the term? Steve Hatfield Dodds – senior CSIRO researcher and President of the Australia New Zealand Society for Ecological Economics – begins a series examining the meaning behind this often-invoked word.

Sustainable development is one of the most important ideas, and goals, of our time. It is defined as ‘development which meets the needs and aspirations of the current generation without impairing the ability of future generations to meet theirs’.

It is not the goal that makes this idea important, however, but the recognition that current patterns of human activity are unsustainable, and that our economic, social and political institutions seem to be losing the race towards sustainability.

The term ‘development’ implies that things are getting better over time. What this means in practice, however, will always be contested – just as most people agree that ‘fairness’ or ‘freedom’ are good in principle, but have different views of what fairness or freedom mean in a specific situation.

At its most basic, achieving sustainable development involves, first, improving the living standards and quality of life of the current generation – especially those who are currently least well-off – and, second, ensuring that current development patterns do not risk undermining the wellbeing or options of future generations.

Achieving sustainable development will thus involve a vigorous and urgent debate about how and why – even whether – current development patterns might undermine future wellbeing. Different viewpoints on the causes of unsustainability include the following:

Loss of natural capital or other critical capital

Deforestation, pollution and inappropriate natural resource management are all contributing to a loss of ‘natural capital’, which risks undermining the health and productivity of important ecosystem processes.

These natural assets are essential to human wellbeing – underpinning agriculture and food production, for example, or providing adequate supplies of clean water. Policies and institutions that treat these assets as free or limitless risk running them down, rather than conserving or protecting them for future use.

Power imbalances in political decision-making

A lack of transparency and accountability in government and business decision-making allows natural resources, such as forests and fisheries, to be destroyed for short-term gains.

Similar processes may undermine other shared assets, such as a fair and accessible legal system. This impoverishes local people and may undermine social and natural capital that could be used to generate improved living standards.

Wrong world views or values

Some argue that Western thinking is too materialist or human-centred, and that this contributes to unsustainable practices because nature is understood to exist entirely for human use. Achieving sustainability will require new ways of thinking, such as accepting that human activities can affect global environmental processes – as illustrated by global warming. It will also require recognition of the impact of unregulated selfish behaviour, and the introduction of ‘carrots and sticks’ to manage this. But this does not imply that sustainability can only be achieved through widespread changes in underlying values or ethics.

As you can see, the idea of sustainable development covers a lot of territory, encompassing ideas of the good life, how humans behave, multiple types of interactions between society and nature, and what we can do about all of this.

We at Ecos have therefore decided to produce a series on key concepts for achieving sustainable development – beginning with this article.

Consistent with the scope of sustainable development outlined above, these concepts can be divided into three:

· wellbeing and development, including capital-based approaches to sustainable development and the happiness– income paradox;

· the dynamics of human and environmental systems, including economic growth and environmental pressure and resilience thinking; and

· specific tools for promoting sustainable development, such as payments for ecosystem services, triple bottom line reporting and corporate social responsibility, and adaptive governance.

We hope that explaining these concepts will help Ecos readers to identify opportunities where they can make a difference in practicing and promoting sustainable development.

More information:

International Institute for Sustainable Development, www.iisd.org/sd/

International Society for Ecological Economics’ online encyclopaedia, www.ecoeco.org/education_encyclopedia.php